Criminal Defense Attorneys’ Work in Medicare fraud Cases

medicarefraudb

Medicare is a healthcare program overseen by the Federal government in the US. It is meant to improve the health conditions of the masses. There are however cases where those who need this help the most do not receive it. There seems to be a level of fraud that prevents this from happening. With the help of a Medicare fraud defense attorney, you can bring a case against those who do this, by blowing the whistle, to shed the light of government authorities on such occurrences.

There are different types of such fraud. It is common to see the perpetrators committing three types of fraud. They can do phantom billing, where they bill for unnecessary medical rules, equipment, and tests. Those rules will not have even occurred.

Billing is another type of fraud where the patient participates in a scheme to share their Medicare number to be charged for medical expenses not received and gets a cut of the proceeds.

Upcoding is another one where medical bills are inflated with more expensive care and treatment than what was offered to the patient.
These offenses attract certain punishments. First, the criminals have to pay back what they wrongfully took. They shall also be fined substantially. There is always the chance they might face criminal prosecution. Those found guilty shall face imprisonment of up to five years.

In case a service provider is wrongfully convicted of those allegations of Medicare fraud, they need to hire the services of a Medicare fraud criminal defense attorney. To shield them from the stiff punishment. These lawyers come in to help in certain cases.

In case there are claims of illnesses that never were, or injuries were allegedly sustained through staged accidents, or claims of alcohol dependency treatment are found to be false, they shall come in handy. They also work where clams for healthcare therapy, treatment, or home care never occurred, or the claims made are under fake names.

These Criminal Lawyers Columbia SC are best placed to defend the providers in such cases. They shall base their arguments on certain points that are clear to see.
In case the defendant knew what they were doing, and it is demonstrated in court, where the provider was not aware of their intentions, they can successfully argue the case. In case the defendant was to incur self-inflicted harm in pursuit of compensation, it can also be a valid point. In case the person who brought them to court is themselves involved in the conspiracy, there shall be grounds to win the case. And in case there is not enough evidence to support any accusation, such cases shall be successfully argued.

Other details can be accessed at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-n-TDDVQJo .

Leave a comment